Barra, S. et al. (2018). Testing the validity of criminal risk assessment tools in sexually abusive youth. Psychological Assessment, 30, 1430-1443.
Davies, S.T., Helmus, M., & Quinsey, V.L. (2020). Improving risk communication: Developing risk ratios for the VRAG-R. Journal of Interpersonal Violence. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260520914555
Ducro, C. & Pham, T.H. (2022). Convergent, discriminant and predictive validity of two instruments to assess recidivism risk among released individuals who have sexually offended: The SORAG and the VRAG-R. International Journal of Risk and Recovery, 5, 14–28.
Glover et al. (2017). A cross-validation of the Violence Risk Appraisal Guide–Revised (VRAG-R) within a correctional sample. Law and Human Behavior. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000257
Harris, G.T., Rice, M.E., & Quinsey, V.L. (2016). Violence Risk Appraisal Guide-Revised, 2013: User Guide. Data Services, Queen’s University Library.
Harris, G.T., Rice, M.E., Quinsey, V.L., & Cormier, C.A. (2015). Violent offenders: Appraising and managing risk (3rd ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Helmus, L. M., & Quinsey, V. L. (2020). Predicting violent reoffending with the VRAG-R: Overview, controversies, and future directions for actuarial risk scales. In J. S. Wormith, L. A. Craig and T. Hogue (Eds.) The Wiley Handbook of what works in violence risk management: Theory, research, and practice. (119-143). Chichester, United Kingdom: Wiley-Blackwell.
Hertz, P.G., Eher, R., Etzler, S., & Rettenberger, M. (2021). Cross-validation of the revised version of the Violence Risk Appraisal Guide (VRAG-R) in a sample of individuals convicted of sexual offenses. Sexual Abuse, 33, 63-87.
Hertz, P.G., Eher, R., Etzler, S., & Rettenberger (2019). A cross-validation of the Violence Risk Appraisal Guide (VRAG-R) in a sample of individuals convicted of sexual offenses. Sexual Abuse. https://doi.org/10.1177//1079063219841901
Hertz, P.G., Müller M., Barra S., Turner D., Rettenberger, M., & Retz W. (2021). The predictive and incremental validity of ADHD beyond the VRAG-R in a high-risk sample of young offenders. European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00406-021-01352-x
Hilton, N.Z., Rice, M.E., Harris, G.T., Judd, B., & Quinsey, V.L (2021). Actuarial Guides for appraising the risk of violent reoffending among general offenders, sex offenders, and domestic assaulters. In. R. Otto & K. Douglas (Eds.). Handbook of violence risk assessment tools, 2nd ed. (131-155).Oxford, UK: Routledge/Taylor & Francis.
Hogan, N.R. & Olver, M.E. (2016). Assessing risk for aggression in forensic psychiatric inpatients: An examination of file measures. Law & Human Behavior, 40, 233-243.
Olver, M. & Sewall, L.A. (2018). Cross-validation of the discrimination and calibration properties of the VRAG-R in a treated sexual offender sample. Criminal Justice and Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854818762483
Quinsey, V.L. (2017). The art of misdirection: Abbott’s shaky take on the VRAG-R. Sex Offender Treatment, 12. http://www.sexual-offender-treatment.org/182.
Quinsey, V.L. (2019). Violence Risk Appraisal Guide (VRAG) and the Violence Risk Appraisal Guide—Revised (VRAG-R). In R.D. Morgan (Ed.). The SAGE encyclopedia of criminal psychology. (1637-1640). Washington, DC: Sage Publications.
Rice, M.E., Harris, G.T., & Lang, C. (2013). Validation of and revision to the VRAG and SORAG: The Violence Risk Appraisal Guide-Revised (VRAG-R). Psychological Assessment, 25, 951-965.
Sewall, L.A. (2015). The treatment of psychopathic sexual offenders: Exploring the influence of risk, change, subtype, and adaptation to recidivism. Unpublished Doctoral Thesis. University of Saskatchewan.
Wertz, M., Schobel, S., Schiltz, K., & Rettenberger, M. (2022). A comparison of the predictive accuracy of structured and unstructured risk assessment methods for the prediction of recidivism in individuals convicted of sexual and violent offenses. Psychological Assessment. DOI: 10.1037/pas0001192
Wirove, R.L., Olver, M.E. & Haag, A. (2022). Discrimination and calibration properties of the Violence Risk Appraisal Guide-Revised in a not criminally responsible provincial population. Assessment,1-16. https://doi.org/10.1177/10731911221116564